Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:02:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:02:25 -0400 Received: from [213.23.21.195] ([213.23.21.195]:3776 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:02:25 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: Shrinking ext3 directories Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 02:01:41 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Andrew Morton , Christopher Li , Linux-kernel , ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20020619113734.D2658@redhat.com> <20020622055318.GA22411@clusterfs.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 936 Lines: 19 On Saturday 22 June 2002 22:59, Daniel Phillips wrote: > ... The directory started at 385024 bytes (38.5 bytes/entry > and grew a block after about 300 steady state remove/create cycles. Another > block was added around 500 cycles. It's up to 1100 cycles now, and hasn't > added another block. It sort of looks like the expansion is getting slower. > This is with dx_hack_hash. I'll let it run overnight to get a feeling of how > urgent the steady-state problem is. And now it's up to 5500 cycles, and still hasn't added another block. Empirically, we're seeing a very steep falloff in the expansion rate, though I'll readily admit the testing is far from sufficient. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/