Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 23:51:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 23:51:42 -0400 Received: from rj.SGI.COM ([192.82.208.96]:30090 "EHLO rj.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 23:51:42 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: Felipe Contreras Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: buffer_boundary isn't defined In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 23 Jun 2002 22:05:10 EST." <20020624030510.GA119@zion.mty.itesm.mx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:51:34 +1000 Message-ID: <4170.1024890694@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 714 Lines: 17 On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 22:05:10 -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >Doing some hacking I found something weird since 2.5.19, buffer_boundary and >set_buffer_boundary are not defined, at least greping the source tree I couldn't >find where they could be defined. > >The weird thing is that kbuild doesn't report that. include/linux/buffer_head.h: BUFFER_FNS(Boundary, boundary). Don't you just love macros that generate names under the covers? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/