Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:11:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:11:03 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:10462 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:10:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 08:04:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020624.080409.79615643.davem@redhat.com> To: alex@PolesApart.wox.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 2.4.19-pre10-ac2 bug in page_alloc.c:131 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <3D173578.5080205@PolesApart.wox.org> References: <3D173578.5080205@PolesApart.wox.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1115 Lines: 20 From: "Alexandre P. Nunes" Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:06:32 -0300 Maybe I got it the wrong way, but it seems to me that from your point of view, as long as proprietary driver is in use, it's not anyone else problem but to the vendor, even if the bug could happen to be in the kernel, is that right? If so, everyone else in this list who could try to fix this (again assuming it could be something related to the kernel and not to the proprietary driver) necessarily share your oppinion? (I'm not flaming in here, just trying to get the path). This has to do with facts, not opinions. Since we lack the source to their drivers, we have no idea if some bug in their driver is scribbling over (ie. corrupting) memory. It is therefore an unknown which makes it a waste of time for us to pursue the bug report. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/