Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758230Ab0GUJdu (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:33:50 -0400 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.105.134]:38943 "EHLO mgw-mx09.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752271Ab0GUJcH (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:32:07 -0400 From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCHv2 01/11] writeback: harmonize writeback threads naming Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:31:36 +0300 Message-Id: <1279704706-1267-2-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.1.1 In-Reply-To: <1279704706-1267-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> References: <1279704706-1267-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jul 2010 09:31:47.0081 (UTC) FILETIME=[8A12DF90:01CB28B7] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 6009 Lines: 161 From: Artem Bityutskiy The write-back code mixes words "thread" and "task" for the same things. This is not a big deal, but still an inconsistency. hch: a convention I tend to use and I've seen in various places is to always use _task for the storage of the task_struct pointer, and thread everywhere else. This especially helps with having foo_thread for the actual thread and foo_task for a global variable keeping the task_struct pointer This patch renames: * 'bdi_add_default_flusher_task()' -> 'bdi_add_default_flusher_thread()' * 'bdi_forker_task()' -> 'bdi_forker_thread()' because bdi threads are 'bdi_writeback_thread()', so these names are more consistent. This patch also amends commentaries and makes them refer the forker and bdi threads as "thread", not "task". Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig --- fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +- include/linux/backing-dev.h | 2 +- mm/backing-dev.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index bf10cbf..5e6b7fc 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ int bdi_writeback_thread(void *data) /* * Longest period of inactivity that we tolerate. If we - * see dirty data again later, the task will get + * see dirty data again later, the thread will get * recreated automatically. */ max_idle = max(5UL * 60 * HZ, wait_jiffies); diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h index e536f3a..f0936f5 100644 --- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h +++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ struct bdi_writeback { unsigned long last_old_flush; /* last old data flush */ - struct task_struct *task; /* writeback task */ + struct task_struct *task; /* writeback thread */ struct list_head b_dirty; /* dirty inodes */ struct list_head b_io; /* parked for writeback */ struct list_head b_more_io; /* parked for more writeback */ diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c index ac78a33..0f7b17c 100644 --- a/mm/backing-dev.c +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static struct timer_list sync_supers_timer; static int bdi_sync_supers(void *); static void sync_supers_timer_fn(unsigned long); -static void bdi_add_default_flusher_task(struct backing_dev_info *bdi); +static void bdi_add_default_flusher_thread(struct backing_dev_info *bdi); #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS #include @@ -279,10 +279,10 @@ static void bdi_flush_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) } /* - * kupdated() used to do this. We cannot do it from the bdi_forker_task() + * kupdated() used to do this. We cannot do it from the bdi_forker_thread() * or we risk deadlocking on ->s_umount. The longer term solution would be * to implement sync_supers_bdi() or similar and simply do it from the - * bdi writeback tasks individually. + * bdi writeback thread individually. */ static int bdi_sync_supers(void *unused) { @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static void sync_supers_timer_fn(unsigned long unused) bdi_arm_supers_timer(); } -static int bdi_forker_task(void *ptr) +static int bdi_forker_thread(void *ptr) { struct bdi_writeback *me = ptr; @@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ static int bdi_forker_task(void *ptr) !bdi_has_dirty_io(bdi)) continue; - bdi_add_default_flusher_task(bdi); + bdi_add_default_flusher_thread(bdi); } set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static int bdi_forker_task(void *ptr) /* * This is our real job - check for pending entries in - * bdi_pending_list, and create the tasks that got added + * bdi_pending_list, and create the threads that got added */ bdi = list_entry(bdi_pending_list.next, struct backing_dev_info, bdi_list); @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int bdi_forker_task(void *ptr) wb->task = kthread_run(bdi_writeback_thread, wb, "flush-%s", dev_name(bdi->dev)); /* - * If task creation fails, then readd the bdi to + * If thread creation fails, then readd the bdi to * the pending list and force writeout of the bdi * from this forker thread. That will free some memory * and we can try again. @@ -430,10 +430,10 @@ static void bdi_add_to_pending(struct rcu_head *head) } /* - * Add the default flusher task that gets created for any bdi + * Add the default flusher thread that gets created for any bdi * that has dirty data pending writeout */ -void static bdi_add_default_flusher_task(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) +void static bdi_add_default_flusher_thread(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) { if (!bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi)) return; @@ -445,10 +445,10 @@ void static bdi_add_default_flusher_task(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) } /* - * Check with the helper whether to proceed adding a task. Will only + * Check with the helper whether to proceed adding a thread. Will only * abort if we two or more simultanous calls to - * bdi_add_default_flusher_task() occured, further additions will block - * waiting for previous additions to finish. + * bdi_add_default_flusher_thread() occured, further additions will + * block waiting for previous additions to finish. */ if (!test_and_set_bit(BDI_pending, &bdi->state)) { list_del_rcu(&bdi->bdi_list); @@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ int bdi_register(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, struct device *parent, if (bdi_cap_flush_forker(bdi)) { struct bdi_writeback *wb = &bdi->wb; - wb->task = kthread_run(bdi_forker_task, wb, "bdi-%s", + wb->task = kthread_run(bdi_forker_thread, wb, "bdi-%s", dev_name(dev)); if (IS_ERR(wb->task)) { wb->task = NULL; -- 1.7.1.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/