Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:57:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:57:11 -0400 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.102]:65192 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:57:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 14:56:14 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Rik van Riel cc: Linus Torvalds , Craig Kulesa , Ingo Molnar , Dave Jones , Daniel Phillips , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, rwhron@earthlink.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] (1/2) reverse mapping VM for 2.5.23 (rmap-13b) Message-ID: <752101.1024930574@mbligh.des.sequent.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 892 Lines: 22 >> A quick rough calculation indicates that the Oracle test I was helping >> out with was consuming almost 10Gb of PTEs without rmap - 30Gb for >> overhead doesn't sound like fun to me ;-( > > 10 GB is already bad enough that rmap isn't so much causing > a problem but increasing an already untolerable problem. Yup, I'm not denying there's an large existing problem there, but at least we can fit it into memory right now. Just something to bear in mind when you're benchmarking. > Now we just need volunteers for the implementation ;) We have some people looking at it already, but it's not the world's most trivial problem to solve ;-) M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/