Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755634Ab0GVIje (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 04:39:34 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:53477 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751941Ab0GVIjb (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 04:39:31 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 Message-ID: <4C4803B3.1020808@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:39:15 +0900 From: Koki Sanagi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Horman CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, scott.a.mcmillan@intel.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/5] skb: add tracepoints to freeing skb References: <4C44F12F.5090908@jp.fujitsu.com> <4C44F286.1050907@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100720115044.GD1995@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <4C469BA1.7050900@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100721105645.GA21259@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> In-Reply-To: <20100721105645.GA21259@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 6139 Lines: 194 (2010/07/21 19:56), Neil Horman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 04:02:57PM +0900, Koki Sanagi wrote: >> (2010/07/20 20:50), Neil Horman wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 09:49:10AM +0900, Koki Sanagi wrote: >>>> [RFC PATCH v3 4/5] skb: add tracepoints to freeing skb >>>> This patch adds tracepoint to consume_skb, dev_kfree_skb_irq and >>>> skb_free_datagram_locked. Combinating with tracepoint on dev_hard_start_xmit, >>>> we can check how long it takes to free transmited packets. And using it, we can >>>> calculate how many packets driver had at that time. It is useful when a drop of >>>> transmited packet is a problem. >>>> >>>> -0 [001] 241409.218333: consume_skb: skbaddr=dd6b2fb8 >>>> -0 [001] 241409.490555: dev_kfree_skb_irq: skbaddr=f5e29840 >>>> >>>> udp-recv-302 [001] 515031.206008: skb_free_datagram_locked: skbaddr=f5b1d900 >>>> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Koki Sanagi >>>> --- >>>> include/trace/events/skb.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> net/core/datagram.c | 1 + >>>> net/core/dev.c | 2 ++ >>>> net/core/skbuff.c | 1 + >>>> 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/include/trace/events/skb.h b/include/trace/events/skb.h >>>> index 4b2be6d..84c9041 100644 >>>> --- a/include/trace/events/skb.h >>>> +++ b/include/trace/events/skb.h >>>> @@ -35,6 +35,48 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb, >>>> __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location) >>>> ); >>>> >>>> +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(free_skb, >>>> + >>>> + TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb), >>>> + >>>> + TP_ARGS(skb), >>>> + >>>> + TP_STRUCT__entry( >>>> + __field( void *, skbaddr ) >>>> + ), >>>> + >>>> + TP_fast_assign( >>>> + __entry->skbaddr = skb; >>>> + ), >>>> + >>>> + TP_printk("skbaddr=%p", __entry->skbaddr) >>>> + >>>> +); >>>> + >>>> +DEFINE_EVENT(free_skb, consume_skb, >>>> + >>>> + TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb), >>>> + >>>> + TP_ARGS(skb) >>>> + >>>> +); >>>> + >>>> +DEFINE_EVENT(free_skb, dev_kfree_skb_irq, >>>> + >>>> + TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb), >>>> + >>>> + TP_ARGS(skb) >>>> + >>>> +); >>>> + >>>> +DEFINE_EVENT(free_skb, skb_free_datagram_locked, >>>> + >>>> + TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb), >>>> + >>>> + TP_ARGS(skb) >>>> + >>>> +); >>>> + >>> >>> Why create these last two tracepoints at all? dev_kfree_skb_irq will eventually >>> pass through kfree_skb anyway, getting picked up by the tracepoint there, the >>> while the latter won't (since it uses __kfree_skb instead), I think that could >>> be fixed up by add a call to trace_kfree_skb there directly, saving you two >>> tracepoints. >>> >>> Neil >>> >> I think dev_kfree_skb_irq isn't chased by trace_kfree_skb or trace_consume_skb >> completely. Because net_tx_action frees skb by __kfree_skb. So it is better to >> add trace_kfree_skb before it. skb_free_datagram_locked is same. >> > It isn't, you're right, but that was the point I made above. Those missed areas > could be easily handled by adding calls to trace_kfree_skb which already exists, > to the missed areas. Then you don't need to create those new tracepoints. The > way your doing this, if someone wants to trace all skb frees in debugfs, they > would have to enable three tracepoints, not just one. Not that thats the point > of your patch, but its something to consider, and it simplifies your code. > Neil > O.K. I've re-made a patch to use trace_kfree_skb instead of trace_dev_kfree_skb_irq and trace_skb_free_datagram_locked. But I've got a problem. I should use not __builtin_return_address, but macro or function which returns current address. But I don't know any macro like that. Do you know any solution ? Koki Sanagi. --- include/trace/events/skb.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++ net/core/datagram.c | 1 + net/core/dev.c | 2 ++ net/core/skbuff.c | 1 + 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/trace/events/skb.h b/include/trace/events/skb.h index 4b2be6d..75ce9d5 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/skb.h +++ b/include/trace/events/skb.h @@ -35,6 +35,23 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb, __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location) ); +TRACE_EVENT(consume_skb, + + TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb), + + TP_ARGS(skb), + + TP_STRUCT__entry( + __field( void *, skbaddr ) + ), + + TP_fast_assign( + __entry->skbaddr = skb; + ), + + TP_printk("skbaddr=%p", __entry->skbaddr) +); + TRACE_EVENT(skb_copy_datagram_iovec, TP_PROTO(const struct sk_buff *skb, int len), diff --git a/net/core/datagram.c b/net/core/datagram.c index 251997a..96dab4f 100644 --- a/net/core/datagram.c +++ b/net/core/datagram.c @@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ void skb_free_datagram_locked(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow); /* skb is now orphaned, can be freed outside of locked section */ + trace_kfree_skb(skb, __builtin_return_address(0)); __kfree_skb(skb); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_free_datagram_locked); diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index e6a911f..faded6f 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include "net-sysfs.h" @@ -2577,6 +2578,7 @@ static void net_tx_action(struct softirq_action *h) clist = clist->next; WARN_ON(atomic_read(&skb->users)); + trace_kfree_skb(skb, __builtin_return_address(0)); __kfree_skb(skb); } } diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c index 76d33ca..ce0bc36 100644 --- a/net/core/skbuff.c +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c @@ -466,6 +466,7 @@ void consume_skb(struct sk_buff *skb) smp_rmb(); else if (likely(!atomic_dec_and_test(&skb->users))) return; + trace_consume_skb(skb); __kfree_skb(skb); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(consume_skb); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/