Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759290Ab0GVMjY (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:39:24 -0400 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:39776 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753596Ab0GVMjW (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:39:22 -0400 Message-ID: <4C483BF4.3090006@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:39:16 +0200 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Knecht CC: Paul Check , Linux Kernel List , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Drives missing at boot References: <4C2F5ECB.1040505@kernel.org> <4C2F61AB.9030806@kernel.org> <4C317C04.20500@kernel.org> <4C32CE50.6010501@kernel.org> <4C341598.6040004@kernel.org> <4C34A1D5.1090202@kernel.org> <4C34B8BE.5080504@kernel.org> <4C44BD42.3030904@kernel.org> <7141c88bc8c27f26c2187252c0594318.squirrel@thechecks.ca> <4C45AF40.7030800@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (hera.kernel.org [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1485 Lines: 38 Hello, On 07/21/2010 10:54 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: > Looks like I had a failure today. First one in weeks and only the > 3rd or 4th boot with this newer patch file. One of the two drives > making a RAID0 wasn't found so /dev/md11 (constructed from /dev/sdd > and /dev/sde) couldn't be started. I did a cold reboot and the drive > was found. > > If it matters, and it probably doesn't, the failure came on a boot > which had a scheduled fsck to do of /dev/md5 - my main / drive. I > don't see how that would make a difference but I figure why leave the > info out. That's why the times are so much larger in the dmesg file. > (I think) > > dmesg attached. I patched the Gentoo kernel if it makes a > difference, same as I did with the earlier patch. > > mark@c2stable ~ $ uname -a > Linux c2stable 2.6.34-gentoo-r2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Jul 18 14:09:48 PDT > 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU X 980 @ 3.33GHz GenuineIntel > GNU/Linux > mark@c2stable ~ $ Hmmm... that's weird. Can you please make sure the patch is actually applied? Adding a printk("XXX patch applied!\n") near other changes usually is easy enough. Also, can you please apply resume-dbg-1.patch too and reproduce the failure and post log? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/