Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755377Ab0GVPsU (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:48:20 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:56181 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751555Ab0GVPsQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:48:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20100715021709.5544.64506.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20100715021712.5544.44845.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <30448.1279800887@redhat.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:47:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] xstat: Add a pair of system calls to make extended file stats available [ver #6] To: Volker.Lendecke@sernet.de Cc: David Howells , Jan Engelhardt , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1432 Lines: 34 On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > The nice thing about this is also that if this is supposed > to be fully usable for Windows clients, the birthtime needs > to be changeable. That's what NTFS semantics gives you, thus > Windows clients tend to require it. Ok. So it's not really a creation date, exactly the same way ctime isn't at all a creation date. And maybe that actually hints at a better solution: maybe a better model is to create a new per-thread flag that says "do ctime updates the way windows does them". So instead of adding another "btime" - which isn't actually what even windows does - just admit that the _real_ issue is that Unix and Windows semantics are different for the pre-existing "ctime". The fact is, windows has "access time", "modification time" and "creation time" _exactly_ like UNIX. It's just that the ctime has slightly different semantics in windows vs unix. So quite frankly, it's totally insane to introduce a "birthtime", when that isn't even what windows wants, just because people cannot face the actual real difference. Tell me why we shouldn't just do this right? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/