Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758607Ab0GVSE4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:04:56 -0400 Received: from mail1.SerNet.de ([193.175.80.2]:36364 "EHLO mail.SerNet.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751585Ab0GVSEx (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:04:53 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:04:41 +0200 Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:04:41 +0200 From: Volker Lendecke To: Jeremy Allison Cc: Trond Myklebust , Linus Torvalds , David Howells , Jan Engelhardt , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] xstat: Add a pair of system calls to make extended file stats available [ver #6] Reply-To: Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE References: <20100715021712.5544.44845.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <30448.1279800887@redhat.com> <20100722162712.GB10352@jeremy-laptop> <1279817930.3621.14.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20100722180204.GA32008@samba1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100722180204.GA32008@samba1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Message-Id: Organization: SerNet GmbH, Goettingen, Germany Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1115 Lines: 27 On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:02:04AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:58:50PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > > That would make it impossible to export the filesystem with NFSv2 and > > v3. They do rely on ctime checking for certain operations (e.g. deciding > > when to invalidate access and acl caches). NFSv4 needs this too if the > > filesystem has no dedicated change attribute. > > > > Still, I suppose the market for exporting the same filesystem with both > > NFS and Samba is limited... > > Ask NetApp about that :-). They have built a rather large > business on just that fact :-). Jeremy, how many hours have you spent getting "posix locking" to the point where it is now? :-) Volker P.S: For those not aware, "posix locking = yes" is cross-protocol byte range locking done by smbd to co-operate with local processes and NFS. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/