Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757317Ab0GWMIi (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:08:38 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:55649 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753447Ab0GWMIg (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:08:36 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=oWrgRFI6vqGPedP6JoI80paTSr1kX+VhXZ9vf2iu+NJmyWffI4neOxgQtZ9OPcbF/i c/diByYGISyYfNHkzh7tOxDskq0TVqzfoiu+XSA/hIBtmhnbFkC47ku+lAyVIpmhj/vl U4sROrMl5wBwxOjNk0DMJ4J4LZLwtNTSCR9ss= From: Helmut Schaa To: Rajiv Andrade Subject: Re: [RFC] tpm_tis: Fix subsequent suspend failures Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:07:51 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-rc5-wl-default+; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Andrew Morton , tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Debora Velarde , David Safford , jmorris@namei.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <201006091227.15729.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> <5204AD54-F4BF-49A8-9168-3FCA112AAA2B@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100623130700.a032c373.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20100623130700.a032c373.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201007231407.51605.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1411 Lines: 34 Hi, Am Mittwoch 23 Juni 2010 schrieb Andrew Morton: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:55:54 -0300 > Rajiv Andrade wrote: > > > > (top-posting repaired. Please don't do that). > > > > > > This wasn't a very good way to send a patch. I edited the diff, > > > reconstructed the patch and then assembled a decent-looking changelog. > > > I also changed your acked-by to the required signed-off-by, because you > > > were on the patch's delivery path. > > > > > > Pretty please: next time, prepare a proper mergeable patch with the > > > correct attributions and signoffs? Thanks. > > > > Sure, sorry. I was just not certain if I could just resent Helmut's patch to LKML without messing with his authorship. > > You can. Put his "From:" line right at the top of the changelog and > everyone's patch-receiving tools will honour that. If the From: at the > top of the changelog is absent, the tools will fall back to using the > From: line in the mail headers. This patch still didn't make it into mainline and it fixes a regression. Rajiv, do you plan to resubmit the patch or did you expect it to go through Andrew's tree? Thanks, Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/