Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754502Ab0GZL13 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:27:29 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:22981 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754113Ab0GZL12 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:27:28 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,261,1278313200"; d="scan'208";a="589705026" Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:27:09 +0800 From: Wu Fengguang To: Mel Gorman Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Dave Chinner , Chris Mason , Nick Piggin , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , Christoph Hellwig , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , KOSAKI Motohiro , Andrew Morton , Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] vmscan: Kick flusher threads to clean pages when reclaim is encountering dirty pages Message-ID: <20100726112709.GB6284@localhost> References: <1279545090-19169-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <1279545090-19169-9-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <20100726072832.GB13076@localhost> <20100726092616.GG5300@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100726092616.GG5300@csn.ul.ie> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1984 Lines: 49 > > > @@ -933,13 +934,16 @@ keep_dirty: > > > VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(page) || PageUnevictable(page)); > > > } > > > > > > + /* > > > + * If reclaim is encountering dirty pages, it may be because > > > + * dirty pages are reaching the end of the LRU even though > > > + * the dirty_ratio may be satisified. In this case, wake > > > + * flusher threads to pro-actively clean some pages > > > + */ > > > + wakeup_flusher_threads(laptop_mode ? 0 : nr_dirty + nr_dirty / 2); > > > > Ah it's very possible that nr_dirty==0 here! Then you are hitting the > > number of dirty pages down to 0 whether or not pageout() is called. > > > > True, this has been fixed to only wakeup flusher threads when this is > the file LRU, dirty pages have been encountered and the caller has > sc->may_writepage. OK. > > Another minor issue is, the passed (nr_dirty + nr_dirty / 2) is > > normally a small number, much smaller than MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES. > > The flusher will sync at least MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES pages, this is good > > for efficiency. > > And it seems good to let the flusher write much more > > than nr_dirty pages to safeguard a reasonable large > > vmscan-head-to-first-dirty-LRU-page margin. So it would be enough to > > update the comments. > > > > Ok, the reasoning had been to flush a number of pages that was related > to the scanning rate but if that is inefficient for the flusher, I'll > use MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES. It would be better to pass something like (nr_dirty * N). MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES may be increased to 128MB in the future, which is obviously too large as a parameter. When the batch size is increased to 128MB, the writeback code may be improved somehow to not exceed the nr_pages limit too much. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/