Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755554Ab0GZWV2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:21:28 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:56060 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752639Ab0GZWV1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:21:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:21:13 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Maxim Levitsky , "ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , David Quan , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linux-kernel , "kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com" , Luis Rodriguez , Jussi Kivilinna , "tim.gardner@canonical.com" Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH v3] ath5k: disable ASPM Message-ID: <20100726222113.GA6487@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1276933774.16697.11.camel@maxim-laptop> <20100619123841.GA31838@hash.localnet> <1276952554.3332.3.camel@maxim-laptop> <1276961564.5173.12.camel@maxim-laptop> <20100726201322.GI14855@tux> <1280177362.3721.7.camel@maxim-laptop> <20100726210651.GJ14855@tux> <1280179033.3721.15.camel@maxim-laptop> <20100726212543.GA5424@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1113 Lines: 23 On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 03:15:32PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > This may need to be done on a chip by chip basis. Take a look at > > http://www.atheros.cz/inffile.php?inf=68&bit=32&atheros=AR5002G&system=4 > > and some of the other inf files on that site to see which devices > > provide the PciASPMOptIn flag - those should support ASPM states even if > > they're pre-1.1 devices. > > I rather we not bother with these, lets simply follow the kernel's > lead here for its rule matching. Sorry? The idea is to indicate which chips support ASPM even though they're pre-PCIe 1.1. If all Atheros parts work fine with L1 then that makes things much easier, but it would be good to know the correct set of chips that are broken with L0s. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/