Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753599Ab0G1Grc (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:47:32 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:55741 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752642Ab0G1Gr3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:47:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:47:23 +0200 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: lkml , linux-kbuild , Stephen Rothwell , Roman Zippel , Michal Marek , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [RFC] kconfig: introduce alldefconfig + savedefconfig Message-ID: <20100728064723.GA14914@pengutronix.de> References: <20100725213808.GA5814@merkur.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20100725213808.GA5814@merkur.ravnborg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:215:17ff:fe12:23b0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1473 Lines: 40 Hi Sam, On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:38:08PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > After reading some of the mails about the > defconfig files I decided to take a look at kconfig. > > We already decided to go for a solution where the defconfig > files contains only the minimal configuration. > Uwe developed a script to assist but having native support > in kconfig is preferable. > > This patch set introduce "alldefconfig". > alldefconfig create a configuration with all values set > to default values. > This can be usefull when we check if we do have a sane > set of default values. Rhe config can be inspected > using menuconfig. > > The patches also introduce "savedefconfig" which > reads the current configuration and save it > as a minimal configuration. > > In my testing I benchmarked it with one > of the arm defconfings and the final result is > the same (symbols appear in different order). I would prefer to have them in the same order. I havn't checked the details, but I really like getting support for minimal defconfigs done in kconfig directly. Thanks Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/