Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754339Ab0G1H2O (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:28:14 -0400 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:59812 "EHLO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754294Ab0G1H2K (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:28:10 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: CfiPCmeCDREV7wfEeW5K9eIcPAWUyWg7YBbthQCXzEmr 1280302089 Message-ID: <4C4FDC06.3050703@ladisch.de> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:28:06 +0200 From: Clemens Ladisch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Richter CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH + an old question] firewire: ohci: use memory barriers to order descriptor updates References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1457 Lines: 36 Stefan Richter wrote: > We need: > 2. a write memory barrier between branch_address update and wake-up of > the DMA unit by MMIO register write. > > Barrier 2 is implicit in writel() on most machines --- or at least I > think it is. See this from arch/x86/include/asm/io.h: > > #define build_mmio_write(name, size, type, reg, barrier) \ > static inline void name(type val, volatile void __iomem *addr) \ > { asm volatile("mov" size " %0,%1": :reg (val), \ > "m" (*(volatile type __force *)addr) barrier); } > > build_mmio_write(writel, "l", unsigned int, "r", :"memory") > > Does this order the mmio write relative to previous memory writes? This asm barrier prevents the compiler from reordering. The main purpose of writel() and friends is to access the address space where memory-mapped I/O ranges reside; there are architectures where the normal memory access commands cannot be used. This does not necessarily imply anything about reordering semantics. However, PCI address ranges are marked by the device's config registers as either cacheable or not, and the kernel heeds this when mapping these ranges. Registers are, of course, marked as uncacheable. Regards, Clemens -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/