Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756765Ab0G1Xsu (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:48:50 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:41607 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751768Ab0G1XsY (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:48:24 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=m5h18NwWVdJTg1JjTfSc7z/z0ip8Qo9Rzpru+h76GWaOXyoKXIChv+nOdJYxHzuEDQ uQZVAULIU/Jd3Yotewbm89jqP5l2FUxBPcM2e6ngMFHp9UzY9DvrYd1YGpcvtyqP62+O /f6Vhkr/O1J8BiGJQZUsYwF7wgRgn79UoVgNM= Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH v3] ath5k: disable ASPM From: Maxim Levitsky To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Matthew Garrett , "ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , David Quan , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linux-kernel , "kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com" , Luis Rodriguez , Jussi Kivilinna , "tim.gardner@canonical.com" In-Reply-To: References: <20100726210651.GJ14855@tux> <1280179033.3721.15.camel@maxim-laptop> <20100726212543.GA5424@srcf.ucam.org> <20100726222113.GA6487@srcf.ucam.org> <20100726222909.GA6773@srcf.ucam.org> <20100726223326.GA6904@srcf.ucam.org> <20100726225057.GA7268@srcf.ucam.org> <1280223313.3721.83.camel@maxim-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:48:15 +0300 Message-ID: <1280360895.8891.19.camel@maxim-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1104 Lines: 30 On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 08:57 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 23:50 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 03:43:04PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> > >> > I see.. thanks Mathew... in that case since L1 works on all devices we > >> > could just force enable L1 for all PCIE devices. What do you think? > >> > >> Works for me. > >> > > > > On the second thought, there is no 'pci_enable_link_state' :-) > > I afraid that if I add it, I might not do that right for all cases, thus > > do more harm that good... > > I'm sorry, can you elaborate? I mean ASPM code doesn't have a function to undo effects of the blacklist (due to pre 1.1 pcie device). Its not that simple to write such function. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/