Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:48:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:48:27 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:49878 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:48:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 08:47:12 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Robert Love Cc: Bongani , Alexandre Pereira Nunes , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 2.4.19-pre10-ac2 bug in page_alloc.c:131 Message-ID: <20020627154712.GO22961@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Robert Love , Bongani , Alexandre Pereira Nunes , Linux Kernel References: <20020626204721.GK22961@holomorphy.com> <1025125214.1911.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1025128477.1144.3.camel@icbm> <20020627005431.GM22961@holomorphy.com> <1025192465.1084.3.camel@icbm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1025192465.1084.3.camel@icbm> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 724 Lines: 18 On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 20:54, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Well, my concern here is for the pte_chain_lock() / pte_chain_unlock() >> bits. Teaching them about preemption should be all that's needed there. On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 11:40:39AM -0400, Robert Love wrote: > The newest patch should have the code I shared with you. So we are OK, > no? That should cover it, yes. The only questions left are if the user is using the right version and where the bug is. Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/