Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932189Ab0G3Lwj (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:52:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24302 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932157Ab0G3Lwi (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:52:38 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:51:59 +0200 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Tomasz Buchert Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Walker , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Wall time clocks + change in access rules Message-ID: <20100730135159.596eafe6@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20100730132343.4c15bfdc@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com> References: <1280483867-6387-1-git-send-email-tomasz.buchert@inria.fr> <20100730132343.4c15bfdc@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com> Organization: RedHat Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 766 Lines: 18 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:23:43 +0200 Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > Anyway, I think we need better rationale, before we can consider your wall > clock patches inclusion into the kernel. To clarify. I'm not against your patches. I just would like to know why patches are needed (or maybe even how they are used) to see if there is no other/better way to solve your problem. We do not want add new code to kernel (and what more important - maintain it), if problem can be solved differently. Stanislaw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/