Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:21:31 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82?= Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@samsung.com>,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Dries Van Puymbroeck <Dries.VanPuymbroeck@dekimo.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 2/3] USB: gadget: Use new composite features in some
 gadgets
Message-ID: <20100730212131.GA8787@kroah.com>
References: <20100730165450.GA4943@kroah.com>
 <355626.7330.qm@web180313.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <355626.7330.qm@web180313.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 992
Lines: 29

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:57:35AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> 
> > 
> >  We shouldn't be using _any_ netchip
> > ids anymore now that we
> > have our own vendor id assigned to us.
> 
> That's too extreme; the original handful of
> NetChip IDs were (and are!!) correctly assigned,
> and there's no reason to change them.  In fact,
> there's a lot of reason to continue using them
> while config files and drivers expect to see
> those specific IDs (as is reasonable).  That's
> to avoid breaking working configs...

True, I was thinking that for the class-type devices, we could use the
linux foundation vid, as changing them shouldn't matter right?

Or does Windows really care about the vid/pid for a class device
somehow?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/