Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:22:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:22:21 -0400 Received: from insgate.stack.nl ([131.155.140.2]:16655 "EHLO skynet.stack.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:22:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 17:24:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Serge van den Boom To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jeff Dike Subject: Re: On the forgotten ptrace EIP bug (patch included) In-Reply-To: <200206241418.g5OEITq04146@karaya.com> Message-ID: <20020628144639.I51309-100000@toad.stack.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1008 Lines: 23 On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Jeff Dike wrote: > svdb@stack.nl said: > > The patch below should fix these issues. I have tested it on my > > machine, where it appears to work. > Make sure UML still runs with your patch. That was one of the things (and > maybe the only thing) that showed the orginal patch was broken. I know of two other programs that broke with the original patch, ups and ltrace. Both work with the new one. As for UML, I don't even see anything go wrong when the original patch is applied. I can immagine something in UML changed in the meantime that prevents it from triggering the bug, or I might just be looking in the wrong place. At any rate, I have successfully booted a UML kernel, with either patch applied to the host system kernel. Serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/