Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 12:43:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 12:43:50 -0400 Received: from hh1102007.direcpc.com ([206.71.102.7]:260 "EHLO oscar.hatestheinter.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 12:43:49 -0400 Subject: Re: #kernelnewbies moves From: Disconnect To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020627163804.GI9519@ns> References: <20020627123214.27e016f9.arodland@noln.com> <20020627163804.GI9519@ns> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 Date: 28 Jun 2002 12:47:18 -0400 Message-Id: <1025282838.17107.9.camel@oscar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1151 Lines: 35 On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 12:38, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Andrew Rodland (arodland@noln.com) wrote: > > You realize that if you weren't _forcing_ people not to go to the > > channel on OPN, by making it useless, everyone would go there anyway. > > Uh, I believe you have the OPN ircops to thank for making it +m. I know > that it was done by Chanserv directly after riel had left. Chanserv.. as in when the channel owner (Riel) told it to, just after leaving... If the irc ops had done it it would have been completely blocked - you join, it gives a message and kicks you out.. > > > Why? > > Because a #kn that isn't on OPN is no #kn at all. > > That's silly and if #kn had to be on OPN then it wouldn't exist due to > the policies as riel pointed out. > > > I hope the other one dies a slow, painful death, for the good of > > everyone. > > The good of everyone? You're very silly. > > Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/