Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756330Ab0HAPFP (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Aug 2010 11:05:15 -0400 Received: from mx.treblig.org ([80.68.94.177]:33414 "EHLO mx.treblig.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753421Ab0HAPFN (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Aug 2010 11:05:13 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 2013 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:05:13 EDT Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 15:17:21 +0100 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: "Justin P. Mattock" , "Theodore Ts'o" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ksummit-2010-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: PSA: Please update your flash plugin! Message-ID: <20100801141721.GA11854@gallifrey> References: <4C524F7A.20505@gmail.com> <4C558237.1040705@panasas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C558237.1040705@panasas.com> X-Chocolate: 70 percent or better cocoa solids preferably X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.31.5-kvm-i386-2009-10-30 (i686) X-Uptime: 15:11:27 up 258 days, 20:46, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1484 Lines: 37 * Boaz Harrosh (bharrosh@panasas.com) wrote: > On 07/30/2010 07:05 AM, Justin P. Mattock wrote: > > On 07/29/2010 07:50 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > biggest problem here is they havn't updated their x86_64(pure64) version > > yet. hopefully hey release an update soon. > > > > Justin P. Mattock > > -- > > Here too. How do I run (any) Flash-10.1 on a 64bit system (say FC12) without > actually reverting to a 32bit browser? Do I still get to install half of my > system as 32bit duplicates? nspluginwrapper works well enough for me on Ubuntu, but this isn't a kernel problem. (It seems to work better for me in Chrome than ff but hey that's another problem again). Since there isn't an announced date for if a 64bit version is going to be available (only a fluffy statement that they intend to do one) it's a case of having to move back to 32. See: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/11/64_bit_flash_for_linux_dead/ Dave -- -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \ \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/