Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752559Ab0HARxk (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Aug 2010 13:53:40 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:48937 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752225Ab0HARxi (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Aug 2010 13:53:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KFiw0RXZN+qjlrdHmcN7zfoyciRqHWA4MFyxXvLO6OXIcgLIfn9F2OepttUFxKkq3f L7qWT/OO2KKq1b0Qj4E6YSmw288En9zjOmrZQaChzkBHM8fdxtfipT/Yhhj4THNM3R9B BYl2fkmmQtsbTb+6Xj7S9mh0WvgpcmMzdZkgs= Message-ID: <4C55B4AE.8020700@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 10:53:50 -0700 From: "Justin P. Mattock" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100615 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Boaz Harrosh CC: "Theodore Ts'o" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ksummit-2010-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: PSA: Please update your flash plugin! References: <4C524F7A.20505@gmail.com> <4C558237.1040705@panasas.com> In-Reply-To: <4C558237.1040705@panasas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2295 Lines: 56 On 08/01/2010 07:18 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 07/30/2010 07:05 AM, Justin P. Mattock wrote: >> On 07/29/2010 07:50 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: >>> This is a public service announcement --- if you are running Flash 10.0, >>> make sure you upgrade to 10.1. Flash 10.0 has a horrible security >>> vulnerability: >>> >>> http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb10-14.html >>> >>> I have Google Analytics running on the ksummit2010 website, and in >>> addition to discovering that 59% used Firefox and 25% were using Chrome, >>> and that the most popular screen resolution was 1280x800 followed by >>> 1280x1024, etc. --- I also was able to find that while 59% were running >>> Flash 10.1, over 40% of the visitors to the ksummit2010 web site were >>> running a vulnerable version of Adobe flash, which has a remote code >>> execution vulerability. >>> >>> If you were visiting that site from your development system, which you >>> use to push changes to a subsystem maintianer, or even Linus, hopefully >>> I don't need to tell you what a bad idea it is to leave yourself open >>> and vulnerable like this. (This particular security problem with Flash >>> has been announced for almost 2 months at this point!) >>> >>> - Ted >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >>> >> >> >> biggest problem here is they havn't updated their x86_64(pure64) version >> yet. hopefully hey release an update soon. >> >> Justin P. Mattock >> -- > > Here too. How do I run (any) Flash-10.1 on a 64bit system (say FC12) without > actually reverting to a 32bit browser? Do I still get to install half of my > system as 32bit duplicates? > > Boaz > right now I decided to just run the 32bit flash through qemu-kvm either a windows install or an x86_32 linux distro this way I can watch hulu stream TV etc.. Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/