Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752100Ab0HAXwZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Aug 2010 19:52:25 -0400 Received: from TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:50869 "EHLO tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751695Ab0HAXwY (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Aug 2010 19:52:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4C56089B.9090405@ncos.nec.co.jp> Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 08:51:55 +0900 From: Keika Kobayashi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dave@gnu.org CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Fix /proc/softirqs file formatting References: <1280516809.1955.0.camel@cowboy> In-Reply-To: <1280516809.1955.0.camel@cowboy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1949 Lines: 75 (2010/07/31 4:06), Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > Hi, > > The length of the BLOCK_IPOLL string is making it's value be printed too > far to the right. This patch fixes this and makes the output a bit > neater. > > Currently: > CPU0 > HI: 0 > TIMER: 599792 > NET_TX: 2 > NET_RX: 6 > BLOCK: 80807 > BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0 > TASKLET: 20012 > SCHED: 0 > HRTIMER: 63 > RCU: 619279 > > With patch: > CPU0 > HI: 0 > TIMER: 585582 > NET_TX: 2 > NET_RX: 6 > BLOCK: 80320 > BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0 > TASKLET: 19287 > SCHED: 0 > HRTIMER: 62 > RCU: 604441 > > > > Thanks, > Davidlohr > > > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso > --- > fs/proc/softirqs.c | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/proc/softirqs.c b/fs/proc/softirqs.c > index 1807c24..3799473 100644 > --- a/fs/proc/softirqs.c > +++ b/fs/proc/softirqs.c > @@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ static int show_softirqs(struct seq_file *p, void *v) > { > int i, j; > > - seq_printf(p, " "); > + seq_printf(p, " "); > for_each_possible_cpu(i) > seq_printf(p, "CPU%-8d", i); > seq_printf(p, "\n"); > > for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++) { > - seq_printf(p, "%8s:", softirq_to_name[i]); > + seq_printf(p, "%12s:", softirq_to_name[i]); > for_each_possible_cpu(j) > seq_printf(p, " %10u", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j)); > seq_printf(p, "\n"); Sorry for late response. It looks good to me. // Keika Kobayashi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/