Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752919Ab0HBGck (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2010 02:32:40 -0400 Received: from smtp.outflux.net ([198.145.64.163]:33073 "EHLO smtp.outflux.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752493Ab0HBGcj (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2010 02:32:39 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 23:32:24 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: James Morris Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , Tim Gardner Subject: Re: Preview of changes to the Security susbystem for 2.6.36 Message-ID: <20100802063224.GR3948@outflux.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Canonical X-HELO: www.outflux.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 959 Lines: 26 On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:18:46PM +1000, James Morris wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, James Morris wrote: > > One issue which needs to be addressed is to confirm that there is > > consensus on the new Yama LSM module. I had thought there was, based on > > list discussion, but have since had differing feedback. > > I'm going to revert the Yama stuff for 2.6.36 -- Christoph has nacked it > to me off-list. Well, at least I'll have something for my summit presentation again. On the other hand, it's rather hard for me to defend against a private NAK. Care to describe the reasoning in public, Christoph? James, will it stay in security-testing for .37 hopefully? -Kees -- Kees Cook Ubuntu Security Team -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/