Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752983Ab0HBGlT (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2010 02:41:19 -0400 Received: from tundra.namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:45791 "EHLO tundra.namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752493Ab0HBGlR (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2010 02:41:17 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 16:41:08 +1000 (EST) From: James Morris To: Kees Cook cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , Tim Gardner Subject: Re: Preview of changes to the Security susbystem for 2.6.36 In-Reply-To: <20100802063224.GR3948@outflux.net> Message-ID: References: <20100802063224.GR3948@outflux.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 676 Lines: 23 On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Kees Cook wrote: > Well, at least I'll have something for my summit presentation again. > > On the other hand, it's rather hard for me to defend against a private NAK. It's the same nak as before -- I concluded there was consensus on the lists, but was wrong. > James, will it stay in security-testing for .37 hopefully? Not with this approach, I'd imagine. - James -- James Morris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/