Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758148Ab0HDCOW (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2010 22:14:22 -0400 Received: from beauty.rexursive.com ([150.101.121.179]:44788 "EHLO beauty.rexursive.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757933Ab0HDCOV (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2010 22:14:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Compress hibernation image with LZO (in-kernel) From: Bojan Smojver To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Nigel Cunningham , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20100804110248.13a2452b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1280465201.2600.10.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <1280486667.2608.1.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <4C534C9D.8000600@tuxonice.net> <1280532174.2583.1.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <4C5362E7.3000706@tuxonice.net> <1280538184.2583.11.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <4C537A01.5040808@tuxonice.net> <1280540035.2658.5.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <1280551286.3097.6.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <20100802091752.3c9f180d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <1280710453.2727.8.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <20100802101058.d4f1c7b6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <1280712068.2671.0.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <20100802102750.7d414819.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <1280713381.2673.2.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <1280800750.3305.4.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <4C58C771.6040505@tuxonice.net> <20100804110248.13a2452b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:14:19 +1000 Message-ID: <1280888059.2741.8.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 (2.30.2-4.fc13) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 730 Lines: 21 On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 11:02 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > Then, after resume, all vmalloc() area is resumed as "allocated". > > Wrong ? I actually tried remembering vmalloc() returned pointers into a global variable as you suggested. On resume, they were always set to NULL, which would suggest that what has gotten into the image was the state before vmalloc() was called in save_image(). See: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/2/537. Anyone else wants to comment here? -- Bojan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/