Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754342Ab0HDEXn (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2010 00:23:43 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:43493 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753665Ab0HDEXi (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2010 00:23:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pV7TKngmjkY3QGKbF/ka7TFTATvuKJA6bDXJ2jr0Nv56UKUQ78eCg5ktdI7Zh5T+gO Axx3qjIJYFISJxhNO/GOm84pVI089MURMIjyWiyJG65votFgEh9xXCE7BQ/dD2im4XUP dI3hXQJdStNs3SL60TRCyQkyA+7af4qG+wung= Message-ID: <4C58EB17.6080803@garzik.org> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:22:47 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.0.6-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, bphilips@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, gregkh@suse.de, khali@linux-fr.org, Ashish Kalra , Saeed Bishara , Mark Lord , Robert Hancock Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] sata_fsl,mv,nv: prepare for NCQ command completion update References: <1276443098-20653-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1276443098-20653-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <4C23F6C1.7070603@garzik.org> <4C245E50.7090701@kernel.org> <4C247B54.2050900@garzik.org> <4C247C36.6040007@kernel.org> <4C24A903.4060908@kernel.org> <4C5607AF.8020109@garzik.org> <4C567137.9060407@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <4C567137.9060407@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 767 Lines: 24 On 08/02/2010 03:18 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Jeff. > > On 08/02/2010 01:47 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> So, something like this. I tested both flavors of sata_nv but don't >>> have access to sata_mv or sata_fsl, but the conversion is pretty >>> straight forward and failures should be pretty easy to catch. >> >> applied > > Are you planning on applying the second patch too? sata_mv is behaving weirdly in 2.6.35 + these patches, on the older 6081 chip, embedded in a Dell server box. Looking into it... Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/