Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 07:49:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 07:49:52 -0400 Received: from p508872AA.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.136.114.170]:32904 "EHLO hawkeye.luckynet.adm") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 07:49:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 05:49:47 -0600 (MDT) From: Thunder from the hill X-X-Sender: thunder@hawkeye.luckynet.adm To: Thunder from the hill cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [Q] kbuild-2.5: inside or outside Makefile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Thunder from the hill wrote: > You requested piecemeal of kbuild-2.5, and I'm currently hashing it. Thus > one question: someone mentioned to migrate current kbuild-2.4 to > kbuild-2.5, while Kaos' version suggests to at first have a separate > Makefile-2.5. > > Which do you prefer now? Shall I have it into the current Makefile, or in > a separate Makefile-2.5? Another suggestion: have a Makefile-2.4 and a Makefile-2.5, then symlink to which one is getting used. > Regards, Thunder -- ship is leaving right on time | Thunder from the hill at ngforever empty harbour, wave goodbye | evacuation of the isle | free inhabitant not directly caveman's paintings drowning | belonging anywhere - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/