Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S317005AbSFALqm>; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 07:46:42 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S317006AbSFALql>; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 07:46:41 -0400
Received: from p508872AA.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.136.114.170]:14472 "EHLO
	hawkeye.luckynet.adm") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S317005AbSFALql>; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 07:46:41 -0400
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 05:46:36 -0600 (MDT)
From: Thunder from the hill <thunder@ngforever.de>
X-X-Sender: thunder@hawkeye.luckynet.adm
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: [Q] kbuild-2.5: inside or outside Makefile
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206010542510.29405-100000@hawkeye.luckynet.adm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

You requested piecemeal of kbuild-2.5, and I'm currently hashing it. Thus 
one question: someone mentioned to migrate current kbuild-2.4 to 
kbuild-2.5, while Kaos' version suggests to at first have a separate 
Makefile-2.5.

Which do you prefer now? Shall I have it into the current Makefile, or in 
a separate Makefile-2.5?

<URL:ftp://luckynet.dynu.com/pub/linux/kbuild-2.5/>

Regards,
Thunder
-- 
ship is leaving right on time	|	Thunder from the hill at ngforever
empty harbour, wave goodbye	|
evacuation of the isle		|	free inhabitant not directly
caveman's paintings drowning	|	belonging anywhere

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/