Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759454Ab0HDXYt (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2010 19:24:49 -0400 Received: from ovro.ovro.caltech.edu ([192.100.16.2]:38090 "EHLO ovro.ovro.caltech.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759372Ab0HDXYs (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2010 19:24:48 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1377 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 19:24:47 EDT Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 16:01:48 -0700 From: "Ira W. Snyder" To: stefani@seibold.net Cc: Andrew Morton , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , Alan Cox , tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: new gerneric kfifo API Message-ID: <20100804230147.GI23951@ovro.caltech.edu> References: <201005132135.o4DLZ9WI021613@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <1280905854.8441.3.camel@wall-e.seibold.net> <20100804194617.GA30773@suse.de> <1280952551.8594.0.camel@wall-e.seibold.net> <20100804201724.GA32100@suse.de> <20100804145205.524c1c03.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100805000246.57246lmy2qeimft2@mail.your-server.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100805000246.57246lmy2qeimft2@mail.your-server.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (ovro.ovro.caltech.edu); Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:01:49 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2157 Lines: 58 On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 12:02:46AM +0200, stefani@seibold.net wrote: > > Zitat von Andrew Morton : > > > On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:17:24 -0700 > > Greg KH wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:09:11PM +0200, Stefani Seibold wrote: > >> > Am Mittwoch, den 04.08.2010, 12:46 -0700 schrieb Greg KH: > >> > > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:10:54AM +0200, Stefani Seibold wrote: > >> > > > Hi, > >> > > > > >> > > > once again. Kernel 2.6.35 is out and i want to know if there > >> is play plan to > >> > > > merge the generic kfifo API. All complains was fixed, so there is no > >> > > > reason to shift the merge again. Please gibe me a short answer. > >> > > > >> > > These have been in the -mm tree for a few major kernel releases now, > >> > > right? And they are API safe, and only change the internals, right? > >> > > > >> > > If so, I see no objection to merging them now, especially as you will be > >> > > around to fix up any problems that people have, right? :) > >> > > > >> > > >> > right! > >> > >> Great. As Andrew doesn't have the time to send them on, want me to? If > >> so, care to point me at them in his tree, or resend them to me? > >> > > > > One does a little more than "send things on"... > > > > I have a little pile of kfifo changes queud for 2.6.36. The "generic > > kfifo" patches are a large rotorooting of the whole facility, based on > > that work (I hope). > > > > There's also the abandoned > > kfifo-replace-the-old-non-generic-api-kfifo-fix-scatterlist-usage.patch > > which never got resolved with the originator. > > > > > > This patch was included in the latest version i had posted last week. > Hello Stefani, Andrew, I've reviewed the updated patch from Stefani which has incorporated the fixes I suggested into the DMA routines. The DMA routines have my ack, though I have not ported any code to them yet. Thanks, Ira -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/