Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758755Ab0HED1f (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2010 23:27:35 -0400 Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:57874 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758674Ab0HED1d (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2010 23:27:33 -0400 Message-ID: <4C5A2FA4.6080307@goop.org> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:27:32 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.1.1-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: William Pitcock , Eric Dumazet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: stable? quality assurance? References: <1278837584.2538.135.camel@edumazet-laptop> <11606525.291278863922663.JavaMail.root@ifrit.dereferenced.org> <20100716065901.GA31612@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20100716065901.GA31612@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 804 Lines: 17 On 07/15/2010 11:59 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 07:58:42PM +0400, William Pitcock wrote: >> 2.6.32.16 (possibly 2.6.32.15) has a regression where it is unusable >> as a Xen domU. I would say 2.6.32.12 is the best choice since who knows >> what other regressions there are in .16. > Did you happen to tell the stable maintainer about this and do a simple > 'git bisect' to find the offending patch so that it can be resolved? If it is compiled on Debian then its probably that cmpxchg memory argument bug which hits in pvclock.c. J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/