Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759821Ab0HEGzk (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2010 02:55:40 -0400 Received: from beauty.rexursive.com ([150.101.121.179]:36625 "EHLO beauty.rexursive.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759795Ab0HEGzh (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2010 02:55:37 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Compress hibernation image with LZO (in-kernel) From: Bojan Smojver To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20100805062604.GB1546@ucw.cz> References: <1280465201.2600.10.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <20100805062604.GB1546@ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:55:35 +1000 Message-ID: <1280991335.2618.34.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 (2.30.2-4.fc13) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 698 Lines: 18 On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 08:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Why do it in kernel? s2disk should already be faster... Because LZO support is already there, the patch is straightforward and not everyone wants to set up userspace tools to hibernate? If we are relying on s2disk as the only solution, then in-kernel hibernation should be removed. If not, I don't see why in-kernel hibernation should suck that much, when we can make it suck less. -- Bojan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/