Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 21:33:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 21:33:05 -0400 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([208.129.208.51]:30099 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 21:33:04 -0400 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 18:44:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: Louis Garcia cc: William Lee Irwin III , Subject: Re: P4 hyperthreading In-Reply-To: <1022980463.2427.3.camel@tiger> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1 Jun 2002, Louis Garcia wrote: > Did I forget to say this is a UP box? I just wanted to know if > hyperthreading is stable for a UP P4 box. Will acpismp=force still help? CONFIG_SMP must be on. the fact that you have a single CPU does not mean that spinlocks have to resolve to {} with ht - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/