Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 22:53:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 22:53:02 -0400 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([208.129.208.51]:5012 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 22:53:02 -0400 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 20:04:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: Louis Garcia cc: William Lee Irwin III , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: P4 hyperthreading In-Reply-To: <1022981972.2456.10.camel@tiger> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1 Jun 2002, Louis Garcia wrote: > I was just thinking about that. Do you now if this has a real speed > improvement? intel claims up to 30-40% but i've never tried it. the bottleneck is that they share fsb and cache but in any case having an extra exec-path might help more than demage. this is for your sleepless nights : http://www.intel.com/technology/itj/2002/volume06issue01/art01_hyper/vol6iss1_art01.pdf - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/