Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 07:53:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 07:53:36 -0400 Received: from mailg.telia.com ([194.22.194.26]:40904 "EHLO mailg.telia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 07:53:35 -0400 To: Thunder from the hill Cc: Daniel Phillips , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: KBuild 2.5 Impressions In-Reply-To: From: Peter Osterlund Date: 02 Jun 2002 13:53:33 +0200 Message-ID: Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thunder from the hill writes: > On 2 Jun 2002, Peter Osterlund wrote: > > 3. You have to remember the "-f Makefile-2.5" arguments to make, > > otherwise it will use the old makefile system. This seems to mess > > things up so that subsequent make commands fail. > > I tried to "mv Makefile-2.5 Makefile" to overcome this problem, but > > it doesn't work because the original Makefile appears to be needed > > for extracting kernel version information. > > There was no intention to reinvent the wheel. The only _replacing_ > Makefile is a _merged_ version of them. Then you'll also have to find any > Makefile-2.5s and revert them to Makefiles. This will take a moment, and > is not yet intented. Yes, I realize this problem will go away automatically when support for the old makefile system is removed. I just wanted to present my complete list of problems with kbuild 2.5. Except for those three issues, I don't see any advantages with the old makefile system. -- Peter Osterlund - petero2@telia.com http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/