Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 08:03:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 08:03:18 -0400 Received: from pD9E239B5.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.226.57.181]:24483 "EHLO hawkeye.luckynet.adm") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 08:03:17 -0400 Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 06:03:11 -0600 (MDT) From: Thunder from the hill X-X-Sender: thunder@hawkeye.luckynet.adm To: Peter Osterlund cc: Thunder from the hill , Daniel Phillips , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: KBuild 2.5 Impressions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 2 Jun 2002, Peter Osterlund wrote: > Yes, I realize this problem will go away automatically when support > for the old makefile system is removed. I just wanted to present my > complete list of problems with kbuild 2.5. Except for those three > issues, I don't see any advantages with the old makefile system. Well, problem #1 (make TAGS) - what did you use it for? Problem #2 (make NO_MAKEFILE_GEN) is a bit tricky with the new concept. You may try to implement it, but I wonder where you'll end up. Problem #3 is a migration problem... Regards, Thunder -- ship is leaving right on time | Thunder from the hill at ngforever empty harbour, wave goodbye | evacuation of the isle | free inhabitant not directly caveman's paintings drowning | belonging anywhere - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/