Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 09:25:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 09:25:29 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:24569 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 09:25:29 -0400 Subject: Re: FUD or FACTS ?? but a new FLAME! From: Alan Cox To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Andre Hedrick , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 02 Jun 2002 15:29:44 +0100 Message-Id: <1023028184.23878.12.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 13:11, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > So what should we do in case of overclocked PCI bus? > Get overclocked ATA or try to mess with timings? You cannot overclock the AMD on chipset IDE or the intel on chipset IDE. It doesn't actually matter what you do the system is going to be way out of wack. These are chipset bridges rather than card people ram into weird bits of hardware. The VIA stuff and the Promise it makes some sense to try because they may be shoved in boxes with a 25MHz PCI clock, or in a few cases a horribly broke 37.5/41Mhz bus from the early chipsets that had 'idiot only' 75/83Mhz FSB options - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/