Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 20:03:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 20:03:29 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:50429 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 20:03:28 -0400 Subject: Re: Orinoco Wireless driver bugs in 2.5.17 From: Alan Cox To: David Gibson Cc: jt@hpl.hp.com, Linux kernel mailing list In-Reply-To: <20020602233849.GA9381@zax> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 03 Jun 2002 02:08:37 +0100 Message-Id: <1023066517.3439.52.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 00:38, David Gibson wrote: > > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 07:40:27PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:25, David Gibson wrote: > > > The signal/noise bit is probably a red herring. We have problems with > > > the reporting of this, but it's mostly cosmetic. I seem to have > > > confusing and contradictory information about how to interpret the > > > values the firmware reports. > > > > Ok the old driver gets the noise level right, the newer one got it > > wrong, the current one gets it wrong. The good news is the old one > > works, the new one didnt, the current 2.4.19pre one does... > > Um, ok, now I'm a bit lost. I'm guessing by "old driver" you mean the > pre 2.4.18 one (0.06f?) by "new driver" you mean the one in 2.4.18 and > "current driver" means the one in 2.4.19pre (0.11b) - i.e. newer than > the "new" one. Is that right? It is right. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/