Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755861Ab0HIJAy (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2010 05:00:54 -0400 Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:58429 "EHLO adelie.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755619Ab0HIJAx (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2010 05:00:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4C5FC3BB.4030602@canonical.com> Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:00:43 +0200 From: Stefan Bader User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Sandeen CC: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Greg KH , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable-review@kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [stable] [Stable-review] [116/165] ext4: dont return to userspace after freezing the fs with a mutex held References: <20100730171510.105264205@clark.site> <4C56B45E.9010601@canonical.com> <4C56FA35.7060607@redhat.com> <20100802184806.GA16878@kroah.com> <20100807040732.GB16342@khazad-dum.debian.net> <4C5D61E7.9090008@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4C5D61E7.9090008@redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1468 Lines: 40 On 08/07/2010 03:38 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:02:45PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>>> On 08/02/2010 07:04 AM, Stefan Bader wrote: >>>>> We have reports about this patch breaking lvm snapshhots. Eric, there is a patch >>>>> mentioned which is supposed to fix things but its not upstream, yet. >>>>> Do you know what happened to that? >>>> right, patch below is needed to fix things. >>>> >>>> Ted just acked it on the list recently; Greg, I'd either drop 116/165 >>>> for now, or include the patch below which should be upstream soon... >>> I can't take anything that isn't upstream yet. >>> >>> And I just released with this patch in the kernel, should I do a revert >>> and do a new release? >> >> Any answers on this? >> > > Yes, I'd revert it for now, I'm afraid, if the other patch isn't upstream > yet. > > Sorry about that, > > -Eric Upstream as of now (same SHA1 as in linux-next): >From 437f88cc031ffe7f37f3e705367f4fe1f4be8b0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Sandeen Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 17:33:29 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] (pre-stable) ext4: fix freeze deadlock under IO -Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/