Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756637Ab0HIUIj (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2010 16:08:39 -0400 Received: from borg.medozas.de ([188.40.89.202]:35783 "EHLO borg.medozas.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756526Ab0HIUIi (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2010 16:08:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:08:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Geert Uytterhoeven cc: Eric Dumazet , Patrick McHardy , Linux Kernel Mailing List , netfilter@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: netfilter: add xt_cpu match In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201008042011.o74KBSlB026488@hera.kernel.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LSU 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 811 Lines: 20 On Monday 2010-08-09 21:52, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> >> +config NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CPU >> +       tristate '"cpu" match support' >> +       depends on NETFILTER_ADVANCED >> +       help >> +         CPU matching allows you to match packets based on the CPU >> +         currently handling the packet. > >Shouldn't this depend on SMP? Or does it make sense to have it on UP, too? Well one thing to consider is that you certainly would not want to make one ruleset willingly unloadable on another machine (think automatic code/rule generators). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/