Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S317316AbSFCIqU>; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 04:46:20 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S317317AbSFCIqT>; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 04:46:19 -0400
Received: from codepoet.org ([166.70.14.212]:17895 "EHLO winder.codepoet.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S317316AbSFCIqS>;
	Mon, 3 Jun 2002 04:46:18 -0400
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 02:46:06 -0600
From: Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>
To: Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel
Message-ID: <20020603084606.GA15986@codepoet.org>
Reply-To: andersen@codepoet.org
Mail-Followup-To: Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>,
	Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <3CFB2A38.60242CBA@opersys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.18-rmk5, Rebel-NetWinder(Intel StrongARM 110 rev 3), 185.95 BogoMips
X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail.
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon Jun 03, 2002 at 04:35:04AM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> Here are some of the possible uses for Adeos (this list is far
> from complete):

Looks kindof cool in theory.  Have you done any benchmarking on
the performance hit on Linux kernel vs baseline?  What is the
software patent outlook for this approach look like?

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/