DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=s4hHddlBZ/GVx/nVqR5vPQ8HjxmgdqVQLmLHPC2809FNGXAw+sQRSimSvoMFtaLEW7
         AT9T3NPhNIXVl1HpOBfbm1qWYXzr4L4lEvYe+AuYpXC28ywCyAuTbN3nPz36OBbIg9B6
         Cax/ku1qPGLiAwZH47blHwPjk89hF4Jp7zwlA=
Message-ID: <4C607998.90509@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:56:40 -0700
From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091114 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
CC: =?UTF-8?B?TWloYWkgRG9uyJt1?= <mihai.dontu@gmail.com>,
        viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>,
        Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Query: Patches break with Microsoft exchange server.
References: <4C5F9B25.8080401@st.com>	 <201008091735.11105.mihai.dontu@gmail.com> <4C6040FC.2020702@gmail.com>	 <201008092115.25992.mihai.dontu@gmail.com> <1281389338.7143.32.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1281389338.7143.32.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1146
Lines: 24

On 08/09/2010 02:28 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 21:15 +0300, Mihai Donțu wrote:
>>
>> Wait. I don't think we're on the same page here. I'm talking about message
>> signing (which does not require the receiving end to have any key - it's the
>> same plain text e-mail with a blob after it) while you refer to actually
>> encrypting the message. Mm? Or am I being extremely slow today? :-)
>
> Only when you assume that Exchange would pass signed messages without
> corrupting them. It really is that broken.
>

figured the encryption would be kind of a last resort situation..but if 
it's that broken to where it wont pass it along without corrupting, then 
the best solution is to figure out what Microsoft needs in terms of 
encoding, i.e. is there a way to have the scanner scan but not throw 
everything around after it scans.(if this is what it's doing)

Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/