Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 05:14:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 05:14:23 -0400 Received: from relay01.valueweb.net ([216.219.253.235]:59147 "EHLO relay01.valueweb.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 05:14:22 -0400 Message-ID: <3CFB3378.5EB7420@opersys.com> Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 05:14:32 -0400 From: Karim Yaghmour X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, French/Canada, French/France, fr-FR, fr-CA MIME-Version: 1.0 To: andersen@codepoet.org CC: linux-kernel , Philippe Gerum Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel In-Reply-To: <3CFB2A38.60242CBA@opersys.com> <20020603084606.GA15986@codepoet.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Erik Andersen wrote: > Looks kindof cool in theory. Have you done any benchmarking on > the performance hit on Linux kernel vs baseline? Philippe has done some preliminary testing with dbench/tbench and he got something like < 1%. Of course, more testing is required. > What is the > software patent outlook for this approach look like? Alessandro's answer is to the point. Basically, grab the papers, the code and the patent and have a look for yourself, you will see that we're clear. Apart from having the kernels side-by-side, Adeos is based on classic early '90s nanokernel work. No secrets there. Karim =================================================== Karim Yaghmour karim@opersys.com Embedded and Real-Time Linux Expert =================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/