Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757708Ab0HJNs0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:48:26 -0400 Received: from dtp.xs4all.nl ([80.101.171.8]:13379 "HELO abra2.bitwizard.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754860Ab0HJNsU (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:48:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:48:18 +0200 From: Rogier Wolff To: Alan Cc: Alan Cox , Rogier Wolff , Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Question on siig sata 3 controller Message-ID: <20100810134817.GA25874@bitwizard.nl> References: <34979.10.6.6.23.1276144792.squirrel@10.6.6.2> <4C10A81F.50801@garzik.org> <54318.10.6.6.23.1276222123.squirrel@10.6.6.2> <20100615065714.GA9034@bitwizard.nl> <20100615110748.4303a106@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100615145342.GC26989@bitwizard.nl> <20100615160137.62c92494@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <1276622732.6843.2.camel@zowie.clueserver.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1276622732.6843.2.camel@zowie.clueserver.org> Organization: BitWizard.nl User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2332 Lines: 50 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:25:32AM -0700, Alan wrote: > On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 16:01 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Is one of these modules the driver for this controller? I think it's > > > AHCI: lshw says it uses ports cc00 ... and a bunch of others, and > > > those ports are claimed by ahci according to /proc/ioports. Ah! I need > > > better eyes. lshw already mentions that it's ahci... > > > > AHCI will be driving it. > > I have seen this problem with the 2.6.33 kernel in Fedora 13. The > problem goes away in 2.6.35-rc3. (Though networking is fubared for me on > that kernel, so I have not migrated to it.) > > My understanding is the "fix" in the driver was to blacklist ncq for > that controller. I have not verified that yet. One of my disks died again a while ago. So I went to the machine to replace the drive. But I forgot to write down which one had died. So I started it up again. Now I had 7 disks again like before, but a different drive was now "gone". So my RAID had only 6 out of 8 drives and was "gone". Together with some 4.7T worth of data on it.... Next I went to the machine with a spare sata card. I removed the drives from the ASUS U3S6 card, and put them on the old pci sata card. By the time I logged in on the machine, the RAID had found 8/8 drives and I think it had already started rebuilding..... I now haven't had any problems with the drives in more than a week. Performance of the raid has dropped from 600Mb to around 400Mb/sec, obviously because the PCI card cannot handle 200Mb/sec of disk IO. I'm open to suggestions for cheap highperformance WORKING PCIe sata cards.... Roger. -- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 ** ** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement. Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific! Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/