Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932380Ab0HJQfD (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:35:03 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:54817 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932202Ab0HJQez convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:34:55 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,349,1278313200"; d="scan'208";a="826377758" From: "Allan, Bruce W" To: Marc Haber , "Tantilov, Emil S" CC: Linux Kernel Developers , Linux Kernel Network Developers , "e1000-devel@lists.sf.net" Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:34:52 -0700 Subject: RE: e1000e crashes with 2.6.34.x and ThinkPad T60 Thread-Topic: e1000e crashes with 2.6.34.x and ThinkPad T60 Thread-Index: Acs4hEcVgHXA6WIwSfKRYk/RdVxs+QAJFUxA Message-ID: <8DD2590731AB5D4C9DBF71A877482A900164D9279F@orsmsx509.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20100724092644.GA13353@torres.zugschlus.de> <20100730125452.GA21444@torres.zugschlus.de> <20100810120458.GB21511@torres.zugschlus.de> In-Reply-To: <20100810120458.GB21511@torres.zugschlus.de> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1833 Lines: 45 On Tuesday, August 10, 2010 5:05 AM, Marc Haber wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:23:45PM -0600, Tantilov, Emil S wrote: >> Looking at your lspci output - your system has a slightly different >> HW, but I don't know if this is significant. >> >> Are you loading the kernel with any parameters (cat /proc/cmdline)? > > BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.35-zgws1 root=/dev/mapper/root ro > resume=/dev/mapper/swap0 quiet splash radeon.modeset=1 > >> Do you have firewall configured (iptables -L)? > > I am working pretty intensively with virtual machines which are natted > here and there. I have a handful of MASQUERADE rules in the > nat/POSTROUTING chain, but that's it. > >> Also now that 2.6.35 is out - could you give it a try and see if the >> situation had improved? > > Tried, no improvement. > > Greetings > Marc [adding e1000-devel, the Intel wired ethernet developers mailing list] We have had other recent reports of issues with this part that are due to ASPM L1 being enabled. Would you please try disabling L1 after the driver is loaded as follows (assuming your adapter is still PCI bus/device/number 02:00.0 as indicated in the lspci output you provided earlier): 1) First check the hexadecimal value of the LnkCtl register - # setpci -s 2:0.0 0xf0 2) Disable ASPM (both L0s and L1) by zeroing out bits 0 and 1 in the value returned by the previous step. For example, if it returned 42 (hex 42, that is) - # setpci -s 2:0.0 0xf0=0x40 3) Confirm ASPM is disabled by checking the output from lspci again. Please let us know if this helps your situation, thanks. Bruce. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/