Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757953Ab0HJUQx (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:16:53 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:57752 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757944Ab0HJUQs (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:16:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:16:39 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Stefan Bader Cc: Eric Sandeen , Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable-review@kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [stable] [Stable-review] [116/165] ext4: dont return to userspace after freezing the fs with a mutex held Message-ID: <20100810201639.GC12680@kroah.com> References: <20100730171510.105264205@clark.site> <4C56B45E.9010601@canonical.com> <4C56FA35.7060607@redhat.com> <20100802184806.GA16878@kroah.com> <20100807040732.GB16342@khazad-dum.debian.net> <4C5D61E7.9090008@redhat.com> <4C5FC3BB.4030602@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C5FC3BB.4030602@canonical.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1790 Lines: 48 On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:00:43AM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote: > On 08/07/2010 03:38 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > >> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, Greg KH wrote: > >>> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:02:45PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >>>> On 08/02/2010 07:04 AM, Stefan Bader wrote: > >>>>> We have reports about this patch breaking lvm snapshhots. Eric, there is a patch > >>>>> mentioned which is supposed to fix things but its not upstream, yet. > >>>>> Do you know what happened to that? > >>>> right, patch below is needed to fix things. > >>>> > >>>> Ted just acked it on the list recently; Greg, I'd either drop 116/165 > >>>> for now, or include the patch below which should be upstream soon... > >>> I can't take anything that isn't upstream yet. > >>> > >>> And I just released with this patch in the kernel, should I do a revert > >>> and do a new release? > >> > >> Any answers on this? > >> > > > > Yes, I'd revert it for now, I'm afraid, if the other patch isn't upstream > > yet. > > > > Sorry about that, > > > > -Eric > > Upstream as of now (same SHA1 as in linux-next): > > >From 437f88cc031ffe7f37f3e705367f4fe1f4be8b0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Eric Sandeen > Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 17:33:29 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] (pre-stable) ext4: fix freeze deadlock under IO It looks like I can't drop the original one, as this patch builds on it. So I'll just queue this one up. Should it also go into other -stable releases (like .35 and/or .34 -stable?) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/