Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932474Ab0HKBcJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:32:09 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:57720 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751720Ab0HKBcE (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:32:04 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,350,1278313200"; d="scan'208";a="826526131" Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 10 (acpi/apei) From: Huang Ying To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , LKML In-Reply-To: <20100810100228.525d952e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References: <20100810135601.4777e310.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100810100228.525d952e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:32:01 +0800 Message-ID: <1281490321.2744.1325.camel@yhuang-dev> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1372 Lines: 46 On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 01:02 +0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:56:01 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > As the merge window is open, please do not add 2.6.37 material to your > > linux-next included trees until after 2.6.36-rc1. > > > > Changes since 20100809: > > > on 32-bit i386: > > drivers/acpi/apei/erst-dbg.c:106: warning: format '%lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ssize_t' > erst-dbg.c:(.text+0xede6d): undefined reference to `__get_user_X' > > For the __get_user_X() call, in erst-dbg.c::erst_dbg_ioctl(): > > case APEI_ERST_CLEAR_RECORD: > rc = get_user(record_id, (u64 __user *)arg); > > -> arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h: > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 > #define __get_user_8(__ret_gu, __val_gu, ptr) \ > __get_user_x(X, __ret_gu, __val_gu, ptr) > #else > #define __get_user_8(__ret_gu, __val_gu, ptr) \ > __get_user_x(8, __ret_gu, __val_gu, ptr) > #endif > > > so is __get_user_8() not supported on X86_32? > or is this something else? Will fix that via replacing get_user with copy_from_user for u64. Best Regards, Huang Ying -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/