Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932798Ab0HKI4m (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2010 04:56:42 -0400 Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:59567 "EHLO adelie.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932640Ab0HKI4l (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2010 04:56:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4C6265BE.7090509@canonical.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:56:30 +0200 From: Stefan Bader User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Eric Sandeen , Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable-review@kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [stable] [Stable-review] [116/165] ext4: dont return to userspace after freezing the fs with a mutex held References: <20100730171510.105264205@clark.site> <4C56B45E.9010601@canonical.com> <4C56FA35.7060607@redhat.com> <20100802184806.GA16878@kroah.com> <20100807040732.GB16342@khazad-dum.debian.net> <4C5D61E7.9090008@redhat.com> <4C5FC3BB.4030602@canonical.com> <20100810201639.GC12680@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20100810201639.GC12680@kroah.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2044 Lines: 58 On 08/10/2010 10:16 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:00:43AM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote: >> On 08/07/2010 03:38 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, Greg KH wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:02:45PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>>>>> On 08/02/2010 07:04 AM, Stefan Bader wrote: >>>>>>> We have reports about this patch breaking lvm snapshhots. Eric, there is a patch >>>>>>> mentioned which is supposed to fix things but its not upstream, yet. >>>>>>> Do you know what happened to that? >>>>>> right, patch below is needed to fix things. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ted just acked it on the list recently; Greg, I'd either drop 116/165 >>>>>> for now, or include the patch below which should be upstream soon... >>>>> I can't take anything that isn't upstream yet. >>>>> >>>>> And I just released with this patch in the kernel, should I do a revert >>>>> and do a new release? >>>> >>>> Any answers on this? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, I'd revert it for now, I'm afraid, if the other patch isn't upstream >>> yet. >>> >>> Sorry about that, >>> >>> -Eric >> >> Upstream as of now (same SHA1 as in linux-next): >> >> >From 437f88cc031ffe7f37f3e705367f4fe1f4be8b0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Eric Sandeen >> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 17:33:29 -0400 >> Subject: [PATCH] (pre-stable) ext4: fix freeze deadlock under IO > > It looks like I can't drop the original one, as this patch builds on it. > So I'll just queue this one up. > > Should it also go into other -stable releases (like .35 and/or .34 -stable?) > Final call would be Eric/Ted but as far as I can see: .34: not for now (patch that causes regression not backported there (yet)) .35: yes (offending patch has been in 2.6.35-rc1) -Stefan > thanks, > > greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/