DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=BvUdckVlXTJZNPwdx4UjiCUivfyjc5Esmk3+3a50x3NOm+TNXBw+DjIH8tSMsjCmY6
         p1Uq3mxWXsFlk3w0AzuJTfh5VURh+WDY87bzg4NttY7r0KBevfGDUUHLtwMkkK8HvyCb
         JZhCbby+Cjk9+89Z/5fWQUG9EQfr5udMNUIkE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20100809181638.GI3026@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20100806225453.GA3947@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1008061651530.30564@asgard.lang.hm>
	<AANLkTikyRhtfX4R3x_NDgHnXssmfVuhjC5PbhRZ0a7su@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1008062010510.30564@asgard.lang.hm>
	<20100807061558.GA28087@thunk.org>
	<AANLkTi=sMVjya9CH6UoZwJCXJTDRgBhnPXmApU_RHVTi@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100808155719.GB3635@thunk.org>
	<AANLkTinM5e2HGOFavODPZNzZx4KshDSjsvKN4pLpGGgr@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100808213821.GD3635@thunk.org>
	<20100809112453.77210acc@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
	<20100809181638.GI3026@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:18:51 +0300
Message-ID: <AANLkTikwHaKpLdRdxmZj6JDJnsZ+o-jzbVcXhRW3Jmd9@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        david@lang.hm, Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>,
        linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        arve@android.com, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, pavel@ucw.cz,
        florian@mickler.org, rjw@sisk.pl, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
        peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, menage@google.com,
        david-b@pacbell.net, James.Bottomley@suse.de, arjan@infradead.org,
        swmike@swm.pp.se, galibert@pobox.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 771
Lines: 18

On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> But wouldn't an office suite run as a power-oblivious application on an
> Android device?  After all, office applications do not need to run when
> the screen is turned off, so these the applications do not need to use
> suspend blockers.

Ideally the system would be suspended even when the screen is on. If
there are no "trusted" applications running at the same time, then
openoffice wouldn't load at all. Right?

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/