Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 11:26:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 11:25:59 -0400 Received: from mail.loewe-komp.de ([62.156.155.230]:5636 "EHLO mail.loewe-komp.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 11:25:58 -0400 Message-ID: <3CFB8AEA.5080702@loewe-komp.de> Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 17:27:38 +0200 From: Peter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?W=E4chtler?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204 X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nicolas Pitre CC: Keith Owens , lkml Subject: Re: If you want kbuild 2.5, tell Linus In-Reply-To: <3434.1023112731@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Keith Owens wrote: > > >>I regret having to do this but Linus has left me with no other options. >> > > Keith: You're becoming even more stubborn and blinded than ESR was. > > Linus became interested in kbuild-2.5 when someone else than you decided to > feed him with small patches, exactly what I told you a while ago and what > you called a "stupid comment". > > Shame on you Keith. > > Resisting the widely known Linus procedure will lead you nowhere, whether it > looks stupid or not to you. > > Why are you posting that on a mailing list? Is that the attitude: I knew it beforehand? I told you so? Please: not yet another flame war. And you and Daniel are right: kbuild seems already on its way (with help of Kai). So what? Keith: keep up the good work (and better deal with Linus :), thank you - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/